I decided on Thursdays I would challenge myself to write about new or possibly controversial subjects. I need to stretch myself and my writing skills to become marketable. I need writing samples to provide to potential clients. Thus, I decided to have an on-going experiment on Thursdays when I tackle a subject outside my normal area of expertise and possibly comfort zone. I submit for your reading pleasure, my "Thursday Tackle."
* * * * * * * * *
I warned you yesterday, my loyal readers, I'm jumping out of the frying pan and into the fire this week. First a confession. I'm addicted to reality crime shows and live jury trials. I usually have
In Session (formerly CourtTV) on during the day while I'm home. I fall asleep at night to real and fictional forensic shows. My husband is very worried about my obsession. I try to convince him that he should feel very safe. Since everyone knows of my obsession for these shows, if he should expire unexpectedly and questionably, I'm the first one the police will investigate. Besides, after four weeks at home with one or all of the kids, there is no way I'm going to off him. If I really wanted to punish him, I'd kill myself and leave him with the kids.
(My husband proofed my post and said this would be the ultimate betrayal.)
Last week I semi-watched (because I'm writing, reading, and commenting) the State of Kansas verses Scott Roeder, who was found guilty of the premeditated first degree murder of George Tiller. My post is not a
news story detailing the murder or the trial; however, I do need to give you a few details so I can get to my point. On May 31, 2008 Scott Roeder, an anti-abortionist, shot Dr. George Tiller, one of the few doctors still performing late term abortions. Dr. Tiller was worshiping in his church at the time he was murdered.
Where to start? I followed the trial to verdict. During that time I had a lot of thoughts and emotions. I was really conflicted about what was going on in my own mind and heart during the trial. I even mentioned it to my good friend and pastor, when we met for our occasional coffee "to solve the problems of the world."
I don't believe in abortion. I believe that every child is "
fearfully and wonderfully made" in the image of God. I believe my God has a
purpose for each and every person to fulfill. I do believe God has given us free choice to follow and believe in Him, or not to follow and believe in Him. And I believe God knew before the beginning of time which babies conceived would be born and which ones would be aborted.*
I don't believe Scott Roeder had the right to take Dr. Tiller's life. I'm puzzled by his logic. Even on the stand he admitted that only God has the right to make choices about life and death. However, Scott Roeder believed God gave humans the right to take a life to protect oneself or to protect those who can't themselves.
This is my own personal belief (and pet peeve), I think people should act consistently with what they believe. So, while, I don't agree with Scott Roeder taking Dr. Tiller's life, I can understand that he acted consistently with what he believed. However, I'm disappointed that Mr. Roeder didn't continue to act consistently with his beliefs. The Bible says that we are to submit to governing authorities because God, himself allows the government to be in authority over us. And if we disobey the authorities over us, it is like we are disobeying God. (
See this passage)
Scott Roeder never denied responsibility for shooting Dr. Tiller. In fact, he admitted to his thoughtfully executed plan. Dr. Tiller had many attempts on his life, so he wore a bullet proof vest, he drove a bullet proof car, he had guards with him on the golf course, and he had extra security at home and work. Roeder decided the only place Dr. Tiller was vulnerable was at church. Again, I find it distasteful that Roeder killed Dr. Tiller in God's house, but I understand his logic. I also understand his defense that these babies were in "imminent danger." The courts said "an imminent danger defense" might have been available if Roeder shot the doctor Monday through Friday at the clinic. However, given how well protected the doctor was, I can see Roeder's defense that unless he shot the doctor at a place and time where he was vulnerable, the doctor would continue his work.
I feel Roeder should have pled guilty since he never denied his guilt. I think this would have been acting consistently with his stated beliefs. He took authority into his own hands. He should accept the consequences of disobeying the laws of the U.S. and Kansas. However, I understand if he had pled guilty, he would not have had his day in court...on national TV no less. The judge did give Scott Roeder a great deal of leeway in his testimony about his crime and his motivation. Roeder and all other anti-abortion advocates hoped to put abortion on trial. The judge and the state (and even Roeder's own defense attorney) had a difficult job keeping the trial focused on the issue at hand, the premeditated murder of Dr. Tiller.
At the end of the day, and the end of the trial, who won? The pro-abortionists (those in favor or abortions) claim victory. The anti-abortionists claim victory. I may be wrong, but I think Scott Roeder got all that he wanted from his act. He stopped an abortionist (one who performs abortions) and he got his message out.
Me? I'm still anti-abortion. However, I don't like some of the anti-abortionist's tactics - whether it is killing a person involved in providing abortions, bombing clinics or shouting hateful things at women contemplating abortion. When I read through the life of Jesus Christ, I see Him asking questions, telling stories, healing, and serving. I don't ever see Him imposing his will on another person.* This is consistent with His Father, who gives us all the freedom to make our own choices knowing that with choices come consequences, good or bad.
* My statements about my spiritual beliefs are simple for the purpose of this post, I didn't feel the need to go into all the proper theology. So for the ten percent of the people who want to discuss the truth of my simple belief statements, I'll be happy to have that discussion off-blog.
And this is my Thursday Tackle.
Read more...